1/27/2024 0 Comments Www myschool com au naplan![]() In another large survey of teachers from government ( n = 472), Independent ( n = 111), and Catholic ( n = 184) schools across Western and South Australia, Thompson and Harbaugh ( 2013) found generally unfavourable attitudes towards NAPLAN testing. A clear majority believed that poorer than expected NAPLAN results would have negative consequences for the school’s reputation (around 90%). Additionally, there was more agreement that the purpose of NAPLAN was to act as a school ranking tool and a method of policing school performance (around 70%) compared to assisting individual teachers and students (around 50%). It was reported that most educators agreed that NAPLAN narrows the curriculum and teaching practices by taking focus away from other subjects (around 70%). In the largest study to date, the Whitlam Institute surveyed over eight thousand educators (50% primary teachers, 30% secondary teachers, and 20% principals or assistant principals) from around the country via collaboration with the Australian and Independent Education Unions (Polesel et al. As previously mentioned, few published studies have explored parent and teacher attitudes towards the testing in the Australian context. ![]() In the present study, we report more data from our study of Independent schools, specifically regarding parent and teacher perceptions of NAPLAN testing. These results suggested that standardised testing in Australia is not necessarily associated with a negative impact upon well-being in all contexts, and that more research is required to understand when and how standardised testing might have a negative impact upon well-being across different schools. ![]() high ICSEA) Independent schools in Western Australia (Rogers et al. Our results indicated only minimal impact of NAPLAN testing upon student, parent, and teacher well-being in a sample of relatively affluent (i.e. In a recently published study, we reported findings that were somewhat contrary to the prevailing view. 2012 Klenowski and Wyatt-Smith 2012 Harris et al. That is, concerns have been raised regarding a negative impact of NAPLAN upon curriculum, and stakeholder well-being (Polesel et al. In the Australian context, the research to date is largely consistent with the studies from overseas. In the United Kingdom and United States of America, where standardised testing has a longer history compared to Australia, research shows negative unintended consequences associated with standardised testing such as a narrowing of the curriculum, negative impacts upon stakeholder well-being, and general negative attitudes toward testing (Brockmeier et al. Footnote 1 With NAPLAN testing now a standard feature of the Australian education landscape, do stakeholders believe that NAPLAN lives up to expectations? There have been very few investigations of stakeholder perceptions of NAPLAN considering that NAPLAN has been running since 2008. ![]() The information obtained via NAPLAN has been claimed to be of benefit to all stakeholders, such as policy makers, schools, teachers, parents, and of course students. Australia’s national standardised testing initiative, the National Assessment Program-Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) was implemented to foster transparency and accountability within the Australian education system (ACARA 2015).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |